Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Arnold

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2007No. 04-5384Published

1Opinion of the Court

486 F.3d 177

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Joseph ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-5384.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: September 13, 2006.

Decided and Filed: May 18, 2007.

ARGUED: Robert C. Brooks, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant. Joseph C. Wyderko, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert C. Brooks, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant. Joseph C. Wyderko, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., David N. Pritchard, Assistant United States Attorney, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.

Before BOGGS,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Clay; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Griffin; Dissent.

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API