Legal Opinion

Hummel v. McFadden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1959No. Appeal, 23PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

' In this equity suit the appellants seek the partition of both the surface and the coal of a large tract of land situated, in greater part, in Butler County and, in smaller part, in Mercer County.

In 1910 one Tifney McFadden conveyed this entire tract of land, including, both surface and coal, to six sisters surnamed Buchanan. Subsequently, two of these sisters died; upon their deaths, their respective interests in both the surface and coal of this tract became vested in their four surviving sisters, two of whom married (Mary Buchanan McFadden and…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Ray v. West. Penna. N. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Funk v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Elliot Coal Mining Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Hetrick v. Apollo Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jacobs v. CNG Transmission Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API