Legal Opinion

Hetrick v. Apollo Gas Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1992No. 695PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant/appellee, Apollo Gas Company. For the reasons appearing below, we affirm.

The events underlying the instant appeal began in May of 1917, when Clara Niel, a predecessor in title to an estate in land currently owned by plaintiffs/appellants, James and Clara Hetrick, entered into a drilling agreement with Ma-honing Gas and Oil Company (hereinafter “Mahoning”). 1 Cast in the form of an oil and gas lease, the document signed on May 3, 1917, gave Mahoning the right to drill wells and extract oil and gas…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. StrausserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Consolidation Coal Co. v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. WeinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. GrzeskiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Bigansky v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API