Legal Opinion

Allman v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant made a motion in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below sustained the motion, and in this we can see no error. The evidence must be taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff. The exceptions and assignments of error to the exclusion of certain evidence, as follows, cannot be sustained: (1) In regard to Ben Carswell having an understanding that the deceased, Joe Allman, Jr., would meet him near the culvert. This throws no light on the controversy as to how plaintiff’s intestate was killed. (2) “If…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Hill v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Mercer v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Cummings v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API