Legal Opinion

Gaynier v. Ginsberg

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 12, 1988No. 05-88-00123-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing Gaynier’s claims for lack of jurisdiction. Gaynier asserts in two points of error that the trial court erred in granting Ginsberg’s plea to jurisdiction, motion to dismiss and, in the alternative, plea in abatement because the district court has competent jurisdiction and because Ginsberg’s motion was not timely filed. We sustain Gaynier’s first point of error and remand the cause to the trial court with instructions to reinstate.

The case was filed by Ruby Lee Gaynier, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Griggs v. BrewsterTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Pullen v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Gaynier v. Ginsberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  5. Hughes v. Atlantic Refining CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Herring v. Welborn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. Green v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. In Re Stark, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  4. Tjfa, L.P. v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and BFI Waste Systems of North America, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  5. Central Power & Light Co. v. Caballero, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API