Legal Opinion

Roth v. La Societe Anonyme Turbomeca France

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2003No. WD 61927PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge.

When a lawsuit’s defendants lie about insurance coverage and induce the plaintiff to settle, should the courts permit the plaintiff to enforce the settlement but sue for damages growing out of the fraudulent inducement? That is the issue in this case. Sheila and Robert Roth sued La Societe Anonyme Turbomeca France, Turbomeca Engine Corporation, 1 numerous insurance companies, the law firm of Mendes and Mount, LLP, and attorneys Kevin Cook and Douglas N. Ghertner on various claims for damages growing out of their claim that they had been wrongfully induced to…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Rice v. HodappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Butler v. Mitchell-Hugeback, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Andes v. AlbanoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Osterberger v. Hites Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Och v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sample v. MorganCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
  2. Intertel, Inc. v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Dueker v. GillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Sisk v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Bogy v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API