City of El Monte v. Takei
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MUNOZ, J. *
This is an appeal from the order of the Los Angeles Superior Court imposing sanctions of $750 on each appellant for failing to appear at a mandatory settlement conference as required by the Los Angeles Superior Court Civil Trials Manual, rule 11. We affirm the imposition of sanctions, but reverse for a hearing to determine the proper amount. Appellants, Bruggeman, Smith & Peckham (attorneys), and Mutual Protection Trust Cooperative of American Physicians, Inc. (carrier), are the attorneys and insurance carrier respectively for Dr. Toshihisa Takei who is a cross-defendant in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Wisniewski v. ClaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Triplett v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Soliz v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Shipp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Ashmus v. CalderonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
- Sigala v. Anaheim City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.