Donohoe v. Trinity Consolidated Gold & Silver Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Shasta County and from an order denying a new trial. Edward Sweeney, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeal from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.
Plaintiff's action was to foreclose a lien for the value of labor performed upon the mining claim of the Trinity Mining Company. The bank was made defendant as claiming some interest in the**property, which interest, it was averred and not denied, was subordinate to plaintiff's lien. The mining company suffered default. The bank answered, admitting all of plaintiff's allegations, saving that it denied plaintiff’s employment, his labor, its value, and nonpayment.
The labor, its value, and nonpayment were proved, and no question…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Jurgenson v. DillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- P. W. Wood, Inc. v. BlalackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927