Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided March 3, 1993No. 91-516PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINBERG, Associate Judge:

The appellant, veteran Clarence V. Saunders, appeals a January 14, 1991, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision denying entitlement to Service Disabled Veterans Insurance (SDVI), a form of National Service Life Insurance (NSLI). Clarence V. Saunders, BVA 91-01225 (Jan. 14, 1991). The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) has moved for summary affirmance. The Court holds that summary disposition is inappropriate because this case is not one “of relative simplicity” under the criteria in Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23, 25-26 (1990). The Court will…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bucklinger v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  2. Suttmann v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  3. Horowitz v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  4. March v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  5. Owings v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API