Legal Opinion

Pacific States Savings & Loan Corp. v. Schmitt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1939No. 9015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from a decree in a suit to obtain a declaration that the plaintiff Reconstruction Finance Corporation is entitled to a lien upon stock of certain water companies claimed to be appurtenant to lands subject to a mortgage assigned to plaintiff. During the pendency of the action the mortgage was foreclosed and appellant, which had succeeded to the interest of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, was substituted as party plaintiff.

The unchallenged findings of the trial court disclose the following: In 1930, and for many prior years, John G. Taylor owned lands…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yellowstone Valley Co. v. Associated Mortgage Investors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Estate of Thomas v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Prosole v. Steamboat Canal Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ireton v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In Re Johnson's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Cahoon & Maxfield Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McComb v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. McComb v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. Metropolitan Finance Corporation of California v. Clifton C. Pierce and Eileen E. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API