Legal Opinion
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Collins
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 1, 1923No. Nos. 871, 872PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
The plaintiffs are railroad corporations owning and operating lines in California, as well as in other states, and doing both interstate and intrastate business. By these suits they seek relief against the collection of a part of the taxes levied against them in California for the year 1921. The defendants are officers of that state. With one exception the two cases involve the same controlling questions, and accordingly they have been submitted together upon a single record.
Under a system, of taxation established by an amendment to the Constitution of California,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Central Pacific Railroad v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- City & County of San Francisco v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Adams CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1932
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940
- Grier v. City of WaycrossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1961