Legal Opinion
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Adams County
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided July 9, 1932No. E-4300, E-4314, E-4338, E-4305PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEBSTER, District Judge.
These causes are now before the court on exceptions to the report of the special master to whom the cases were duly referred. The exceptions go to the merits of the entire controversies involved in the eases respectively. Milwaukee eases Nos. E-4314 and E-4338 were consolidated, and all of the cases were tried together to the special master who has dealt with them in a single report. Since there are many fundamental questions to be considered which are common to all the eases, 1 shall treat them in a single memorandum, resorting to separate discussion where such course…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Adams CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Public Service Commission v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Chicago and North Western Railway Co. v. GillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.