Legal Opinion

City of Dickinson v. Schank

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2017No. 20160254PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kapsner, Justice.

[¶ 1] Russell Schank appeals from a criminal judgment entered after entry of a conditional guilty plea to a charge of actual physical control of a'motor vehicle in violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01 after the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm the criminal judgment, concluding the district court did not err by denying Schank’s motion to suppress evidence.

I

[¶ 2] Schank was arrested for being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01 on February 20, 2016. On the night of Schank’s arrest, a Dickinson police…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kuntz v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City of Devils Lake v. GroveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Mandan v. JewettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. SadekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Von RudenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. City of Jamestown v. SchultzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. City of Bismarck v. WellsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. City of Dickinson v. SchankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API