Legal Opinion

Lentz v. Spryncznatyk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2006No. 20050234PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Aaron Lentz appeals from a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation hearing officer’s decision to suspend Lentz’s commercial driving privileges for ninety-nine years. Lentz argues the statute authorizing a lifetime suspension of his commercial driver’s license should not be applied retroactively by considering his first driving-under-the-influenee (“DUI”) offense that occurred before the enactment of the statute. We affirm, concluding the commercial driver’s license suspension statute is properly interpreted as including past DUI…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alexander v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. State v. HaverlukNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Smith v. BaumgartnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bjerklie v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klein v. KleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bienek v. Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Klein v. KleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API