Legal Opinion
Schwartz Landes Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard L. Price, J.
Petitioner Schwartz Landes Associates (the owner-landlord of the subject building) moves pursuant to CPLR article 78 to have a determination of the respondent Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) vacated or, in the alternative, modified. For the reasons that follow, the petition is granted and the determination is vacated.
BACKGROUND1
Petitioner is a partnership that is the fee owner of a building located at 424 West 47th Street, New York, New York. From about August 15, 1968 until the present, the petitioner (or those before it) leased the majority of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Walter & Samuels, Inc. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Walter & Samuels, Inc. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schwartz Landes Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Schwartz Landes Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986