Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schwartz Landes Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1986Published

1Dissent

Asch, J. (dissenting).

I would affirm the order of Special Term (124 Misc 2d 1067) directing the respondent Conciliation and Appeals Board (or its successor, the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal) to issue an order granting permission to the petitioner not to offer renewal leases to the tenant.

*84Petitioner landlord owns a building in which 17 apartments are leased to the corporate tenant, Fountain House. The tenant, an eleemosynary institution, designates the occupants of the apartments from among psychiatric patients who may temporarily need housing during their period of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Sullivan v. Brevard AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Tagert v. 211 East 70th Street Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Walter & Samuels, Inc. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API