Legal Opinion
Young v. Moore
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 29, 1954No. 1407PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICARD, District Judge.
This action presents a question that has been debated by Michigan lawyers for sometime, to-wit, whether the non-claims sections of our Michigan Probate Code, §§ 27.3178(412), 27.3178(428), 27.3178(435), 27.3178(432), Comp.Laws 1948, §§ 708.2, 708.18, 708.25, 708.22, have the effect of changing the statutes of limitations as provided in the general law M.S.A. §§ 27.605 and 27.610, Comp. Laws 1948, §§ 609.13, 609.18, where one having an unliquidated claim, not presented for allowance before the estate was closed, seeks later to bring action under section 27.3178(432),…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- In Re Chamberlain's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Patrick v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hinz v. Curzenski EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Melvin v. ReadingMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re Critchell EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Maxman v. GoldsmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hinz v. Curzenski EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.