Legal Opinion

Large v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1934No. 25071. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This cause was heard in the superior court on the amended complaint of George E. Large. A. 0. Martin, as commissioner of public lands, appearing separately, filed a demurrer to the amended complaint; A. C. Martin, Otto Case and E. N. Hutchinson, as members of the board of state land commissioners, appearing, filed a demurrer to the amended complaint; and A. J. Chitty, as receiver, and Edna R. Shively appearing, filed a demurrer to the amended complaint. The demurrers were sustained. The plaintiff elected to stand upon his amended complaint, and a judgment was entered dismissing the action. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warburton v. RalphWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Large v. ShivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Barber v. Grand Summitt Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Large v. ShivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API