Mihesuah v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALDECOTT, J.
Petitioner seeks review of Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board opinion and order after reconsideration (February 1, 1972). The opinion and order after reconsideration affirmed and adopted the referee’s finding that the applicant’s cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations. In view of the fact that the referee and the board found that the petitioner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations, they did not rule on whether the applicant had sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment.
Petitioner has had a sixth grade education.…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Honeywell v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Reynolds v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Frost v. Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
- Hurwitz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Kaiser Foundation Hosp. v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.California Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.