Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1974No. S.F. 23119PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

Petitioner seeks review and annulment of an opinion and decision after reconsideration of respondent Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter referred to as “the board”) holding that his claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

Facts: On February 20, 1968, around 10 or 10:15 a.m., petitioner, who was well when he started to work that day, began to experience pain in his chest and left arm while loading heavy timbers onto a truck in the course of his employment with respondent Pacific Gas and Electric Company (hereinafter referred to as “PG&E”). He requested…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mihesuah v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Honeywell v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hurwitz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Kaiser Foundation Hosp. v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.California Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Neuberger v. Hennepin County WorkhouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API