Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Burback

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 3, 1986No. D8507-65686; CA A37800PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Mother appeals from a trial court judgment dismissing her motion to modify the child support provision of the parties’ California dissolution decree. The court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We disagree and reverse.

The parties grew up and met each other in Oregon. In 1976, they were married. Their first child was born in 1978. In 1979, they were divorced. In 1980, they remarried. A second child was born in 1981. Later that year, the family moved to California, where they lived until 1982, when they again separated. Mother and the children returned to Oregon. Father…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hawkins v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Lorenz v. RoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Starr v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re KlarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API