Legal Opinion

Prescott v. Seacoast Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1923No. 13865PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “ While a plea of total failure of consideration includes partial failure of consideration, there must be evidence introduced showing the extent to which the consideration has failed, before a verdict can be rendered giving the defendant the benefit of a partial failure.” Grier v. Enterprise Stone Co., 126 Ga. 17 (54 S. E. 806); Consolidated Phosphate Co. v. Sturtevant, 20 Ga. App. 474 (5), 478 (93 S. E. 55); Richardson v. Studebaker Corp., 29 Ga. App. 249 (114 S. E. 648). The same rule applies as to the damages sought to be recouped by the defendant, but which are likewise merely…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Cooper v. National Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Lester v. TooleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Wilcox, Gibbs & Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  5. Consolidated Phosphate Co. v. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Block & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Frank & Meyer Neckwear Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. King v. RichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API