Legal Opinion

King v. Rich

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1961No. 38616PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

The four items contended for by the defendants to constitute a failure of consideration will be considered in order. It appears that although the franchise had in fact expired, no cost was connected therewith, and it was renewed by Gulf Oil Company immediately after notice to it. The sink and hot water heater were also admitted by Gulf Oil Company to be the property of the plaintiff, and accordingly became the property of the defendant. As to the matter of inventory, the value was, according to the estimate of an independent appraiser substantially under the purchase…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Long Cigar & Grocery Co. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Frank & Meyer Neckwear Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Prescott v. Seacoast Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Toole v. Brownlow & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API