Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hodges v. Gray

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1995No. 94-1191Published

1Dissent

Blair Arnold, Special Justice,

Dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the first and second contempt findings in this case. I believe these findings of contempt reflect an overly sensitive reaction by the Chancellor to reasonable efforts of appellant to try his case under very difficult circumstances.

BACKGROUND

To properly analyze this case, I believe a thorough scrutiny of the background is critical. As stated by Special Justice Kathleen V. Compton in her dissent in Skokos v. Gray, 318 Ark. 571, 886 S.W.2d 618 (1994):

The transcript and briefs in this case indicate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. In Re LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. First American Carriers, Inc. v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Anthony Pools v. Charles & David, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Skokos v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API