Anthony Pools v. Charles & David, Inc.

OPINION

JUNELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict which found appellant had tor-tiously interfered with certain of appellee’s contractual rights. Appellant brings six points of error alleging: (1) appellant was privileged to act as it did; (2) no evidence to support the jury findings; (3) insufficient evidence to support the jury findings; (4) improperly admitted evidence; (5) improper award of punitive damages; and (6) jury misconduct in the form of a quotient verdict. We reverse and remand.

The undisputed facts are: Appellee is a Texas corporation owned one-half by…