Skokos v. Gray
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
Pamela F. Skokos seeks a writ of certiorari to disqualify the respondent, Chancellor Alice S. Gray, from presiding in divorce proceedings instituted by Ms. Skokos. Judge Gray denied three motions by Ms. Skokos that she recuse. We deny the writ because the decision by a judge whether or not to recuse lies within the judge’s discretion, and certiorari does not lie to control a judge’s discretion. Ms. Skokos also asks that we disqualify an attorney representing Mr. Skokos as well as an attorney ad litem appointed to represent the interest of a minor child of the Skokoses.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lupo v. LinebergerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Purcell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- City of Jacksonville v. VenhausSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Burnette v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Gran v. HaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hodges v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Lenser v. McGowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Stilley v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- State of Arkansas v. Mauricio A. TorresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.