United States v. 150 Cases of Fruit Puddine
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Information by the United States against One Hundred and Fifty Cases of Fruit Puddine..
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
This is a proceeding, under the Food and Drugs Act, by information (or libel) against 150 cases of a food product called “Puddine” or “Fruit Puddine.” A jury having been waived by both parties, the case was tried before me upon fact and law. I find the material facts, in addition to those alleged in the information and admitte.d in the answer, to be as follows:
“Puddine” or “Fruit Puddine” is the distinctive name, adopted and used as early as 1889, of a proprietary food product consisting largely of cornstarch. It is manufactured by the claimant and is put up in packages…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Antikamnia Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hall-Baker Grain Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- United States v. Forty Barrels & Twenty Kegs of Coca-ColaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1911
- Brina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- United States v. Seventy-Five Boxes of Alleged PepperDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Newton Tea & Spice Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Newton Tea & Spice Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
- United States v. Article of Food Consisting of 432 CartonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- United States v. 17 BOTTLES, ETC.District Court, D. Maryland · 1932
- Parke, Davis & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919