Legal Opinion
United States v. 17 BOTTLES, ETC.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 5, 1932No. 4666, 4667PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In these consolidated eases the government seeks to condemn under the act of Congress known as the Food and Drags Act of June 30, 1906, as amended in 1912 (United States Code, title 21, §§ 1-15 [21 USCA §§ 1-15]), certain cartons containing bottles of a proprietary drug arbitrarily called “B. & M.” It is alleged in the libels that this drug is (1) adulterated and (2) misbranded, within the meaning of the act. The act is operative, so far as the states are concerned, only to interstate commerce, and it is alleged in the libels that the offending packages were shipped…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- McDermott v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Cooper v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Commercial Creamery Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1942
- United States v. Fifty-Nine Tubes, more or less, of Lutein TabletsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940