Newton Tea & Spice Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error was proceeded against by information for the violation of the misbranding provisions of the National Food and Drug Act (Act June 30, 1906, 34 Stat. 768, c. 3915, §§ 2 and 8; Comp. St. §§ 8718 and 8724). The article of food in question is an egg substitute called “Eggno,” whose principal ingredients and their relative proportions are commercial (imported) egg albumen and egg yolk, dried and pulverized (aggregating about 15 per cent.), powdered and evaporated skimmed milk, about 35 per cent, (as indicated by the government’s proofs, apparently much less…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bettman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Tyomies Pub. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Dierkes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Aronberg v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Emmich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Billingsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.