State v. Duran
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
{1} This appeal requires us to decide whether Defendant’s constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was violated when, in the course of a routine traffic stop, Defendant and her passenger were separated and repeatedly questioned about their itinerary. We hold that the questioning of Defendant and her passenger was neither reasonably related to the purposes of the stop nor based upon particularized and objective factors giving rise to a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot. We further hold that Defendant’s consent to a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Cardenas-AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. F.J.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- State v. GallowayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FunderburgNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PrinceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. PonceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.