Legal Opinion

Kittay & Blitz, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 25, 1955No. 59105; protest 212913-K (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar consists of certain opaque glass stones of different sizes and shapes, invoiced under item Nos. 6151 and 6152, covered by entry No. 974602. It was assessed with duty by the collector at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 218 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, made effective by the President’s proclamation, T. D. 51898, for “* * * au articles of every description not specially provided for, composed *386wholly or in chief value of glass * * * or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  2. Klein v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API