Legal Opinion
Reyher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 2007No. 06CA0239PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HAWTHORNE.
In this case under the Colorado Automobile Accident Reparations Act (No-Fault Act), plaintiffs, Pauline Reyher and Dr. Wallace Brucker, appeal the trial court's summary judgment in favor of defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and the trial court's order striking their class action allegations. We reverse the judgment, vacate the order, and remand the case for further proceedings.
I. Background
Reyher was insured under a no-fault insurance policy issued by State Farm. That policy was governed by § 10-4-706(1)(b) of the No-Fault Act, which at that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Klein v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Medina v. Conseco Annuity Assurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- ITT Specialty Risk Services v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. SestileDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Blankenship v. Iowa National Mutual Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Globe Surgical Supply v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReyherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Reyher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Reyher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Horace v. Cincinnati Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024