Legal Opinion
Reyher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 24, 2009No. 08CA2021, 09CA0080PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HAWTHORNE.
In this action concerning the payment of medical bills under the Colorado Automobile Accident Reparations Act (No-Fault Act), plaintiffs, Pauline Reyher and Dr. Wallace Brucker, appeal the trial court’s four separate orders (1) dismissing Reyher’s claims because she lacks standing, (2) denying plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, (3) denying plaintiffs’ motion to compel certain discovery and granting a protective order to defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and (4) finding that Dr. Brucker spoliated evidence. We reverse the order…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Margaret L. Johnston v. Hbo Film Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ivar v. Elk River Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- Southern Colorado Orthopaedic Clinic Sports Medicine & Arthritis Surgeons, P.C. v. WeinsteinColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReyherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Reyher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012