Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Reyher
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 31, 2011No. 10SC77PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
The class certification issue presented by this appeal arises from a dispute concerning the payment of medical bills under the Colorado Automobile Accident Reparations Act ("No-Fault Act"). Plaintiffs, Pauline Reyher and Dr. Wallace Brucker, filed suit against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") alleging that it failed to pay the full, reasonable amount of medical expenses in violation of the No-Fault Act and its contracts. Plaintiffs subsequent ly moved for certification of two classes that included all insureds and all providers, respectively, who submitted a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lockwood Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Peiffer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Buckley Powder Co. v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Jackson v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- v. GEICO Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- BP America Production Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Sipes v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Town of Breckenridge v. Egencia, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Ayala v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.