Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Newman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2006No. 20050505PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

¶ 1 Petitioner Gary Newman asks this court to hold that a municipal ordinance is invalid when it implicitly conflicts with a state statute. Specifically, Newman challenges a Salt Lake City battery ordinance because it lacks an injury element found in the corresponding state statute. Without an injury element, the ordinance arguably prohibits that which the state statute implicitly permits: a battery that does not involve injury or risk of injury. We conclude that such an implied conflict does not render an ordinance unconstitutional. Because we discern no actual conflict…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Redwood Gym v. Salt Lake County CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Salt Lake City v. KusseUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Salt Lake City v. AllredUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hansen v. EyreUtah Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barker v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  2. Sidwell v. Wasatch CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API