Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Eyre

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2005No. 20030731PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Petitioner Tyler Hansen (Hansen) seeks review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming the district court’s denial of his motion for partial summary judgment. Hansen’s motion asked the trial court to hold, as a matter of law, that Hansen was legally justified in riding his bicycle in a bike lane on the left-hand side of the road, pursuant to Salt Lake City Code section 12.80.070. We affirm the decision of the court of appeals and hold that Hansen was not justified in riding his bicycle on the left-hand side of the road for the reasons set forth below.

BA…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. EscobarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. DeanUtah Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Normandeau v. Hanson Equipment, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. RushtonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. WilderUtah Supreme Court · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API