Legal Opinion
Rumpke Road Development Corp. v. Union Township Board of Trustees
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 28, 1996No. CA96-04-040PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William W. Young, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, the Rumpke Road Development Corporation and the Coolock Corporation, Trustee, among others, appeal summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, the Union Township Board of Trustees, on appellants’ complaint for a declaratory judgment. The trial court determined that application of the Union Township Zoning Resolution to appellants’ property was not unconstitutional. 1
Union Township adopted a zoning resolution in 1959. Appellants currently own undeveloped property on the east and west sides of Rumpke Road in Union Township. Appellants’ two…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Samuel J. Jordon v. John J. GilliganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Gerijo, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Fischer Development Co. v. Union Township, Unpublished Decision (5-1-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Prows v. OxfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2026