Legal Opinion
Fischer Development Co. v. Union Township, Unpublished Decision (5-1-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 2000No. Case Nos. 99 CVH 0691, 99 CVH 0692, 99 CVH 0693, 99 CVH 0694, 99 CVH 0710Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
The plaintiffs each filed their complaints in August, 1999, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief as well as damages. Plaintiffs in three of the cases, 99-CVH-0691 ("the Fischer case"), 99-CVH-0692 ("the Aspen case"), and 99-CVH-0693 ("the MI Homes case") sought a temporary restraining order, which was denied after a hearing on August 13, 1999. Presently before the Court is the plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. For purposes of this motion only, all the cases were consolidated, and a hearing was held on August 23-24, 1999.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On March 9, 1999, Defendant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick, Inc., Cadillac Brick Co., and Century Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Desenco, Inc. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. CahillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.