Reynolds v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George K. Cracraft, Chief Judge.
Dickie Reynolds appeals from his conviction of conspiracy to deliver controlled substances and possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a felony. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his prior felony conviction because it was not established that he had knowingly and willingly waived his right to counsel at the time of that conviction, that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a transcript of a report made by the officers after his arrest, and in permitting the prosecuting attorney to make improper argument…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Gooch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987
- Snyder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.