Legal Opinion
Mark Schenck v. The City of Hudson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1997No. 96-3881PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MOORE, J., joined. NORRIS, J. (pp. 595-596), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
RUSSELL, District Judge.
This ease involves a slow-growth zoning ordinance enacted by the defendant City of Hudson. The plaintiffs, primarily developers who already own land in Hudson, brought this action seeking a permanent injunction against the enforcement of the ordinance. After a two-day hearing, the district court granted a preliminary injunction1 and this appeal ensued. Upon review, we find that the plaintiffs have failed to show a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Terri L. Hamad v. Woodcrest Condominium AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Thompson v. AsheCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Walter Meade Pugh, Jr. (03-3241) and Tyreese Pugh (03-3243)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Robert T. Richardson v. Township of BradyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.