Legal Opinion
United States v. Walter Meade Pugh, Jr. (03-3241) and Tyreese Pugh (03-3243)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 3, 2005No. 03-3241, 03-3243PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Walter Meade Pugh, Jr. and Tyreese Pugh appeal their convictions related to an armed bank robbery and their sentences entered on February 10, 2003, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the convictions of Walter Pugh, and REVERSE, in part, and AFFIRM, in part, the convictions of Tyreese Pugh. We REMAND this case to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
At approximately 2:20 p.m. on April 24, 2002, two armed men robbed the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- United States v. William Anthony Johnson (04-5110/6161) and Christopher L. Stone (04-5146)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Gilberto Martinez (03-3833), Jerel Henderson (03-3835), Kevin S. Harris (03-3879), Brian Garrett (03-3917)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- United States v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.