Legal Opinion

Globe Works v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 6, 1910No. 22906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowRy, J.

This is a motion by defendants to dismiss plaintiff’s petition on the grounds (1) that the corporation plaintiff never filed nor intended to file the petition, or petition of any kind, under and in accordance with the terms of the jurisdictional *499act set forth in the margin; a (2) that the original contractor, the Globe Works, has never been and is not now represented by counsel; (3) that one Nathaniel McKay, the real claimant in the proceeding, died on July 10, 1902, and the cause has never been revived in the name of his executors; and (4) that a contract transferring the claim and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Beers Ex Rel. Platenius v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Burnes v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pewee Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  2. Brewer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921
  3. McCormick & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  4. PEWEE COAL COMPANY v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API