Legal Opinion

Brewer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 14, 1921No. 34085PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The Beporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. On May 7, 1918, a contract was made and entered into by and between Bruce M. Brewer and T. Barton J ones, partners trading as Brewer & Jones, and the United States, represented by Lieut. Col. C. A. F. Flagler, Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army.

Read the full summary

The Beporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. On May 7, 1918, a contract was made and entered into by and between Bruce M. Brewer and T. Barton J ones, partners trading as Brewer & Jones, and the United States, represented by Lieut. Col. C. A. F. Flagler, Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army. A copy of said contract and the specifications attached thereto are attached to the petition, marked “ Exhibits A and B,” and are made a part hereof by reference. By the terms of the contract, Brewer and Jones were to complete Lock and Dam No. 2,…

1Opinion of the CourtHat, Judge

This is a suit brought by Brewer & Jones, the plaintiffs, to recover from the United States certain sums of money which they claim are owing to them under a contract entered into by them with the United States on May 7,1913.

On May 7,1913, the plaintiffs entered into a contract with the United States whereby they agreed to complete the work, then partially finished, on Lock and Dam No. 2, Tombigbee *86River, Alabama. Before this contract was entered into one P. H. O’Brien had a contract with the United States providing for the construction of Lock and Dam No. 2, and Lock and Dam No. 3, Tombigbee…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Globe Works v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Mississippi Valley Iron Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API