Legal Opinion

City of Gastonia v. Glenn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is provided by O. S., 1716, that in condemnation, the petition, when filed by the condemnor, “must contain a description of the real estate which the corporation seeks to acquire.” This we apprehend means a description of the property sought to be acquired and not merely a description of the entire tract over which the right of way, privilege, or easement is to run. Tbe right o£ way is to be located before it can be taken. It must be fixed and not fugitive. See Johnston County v. Stewart, 217 N. C., 334, 7 S. E. (2d), 708. In other words, to paraphrase a certain parody, “the recipe for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Wells.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Johnston County v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Petty v. . LemonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Charlotte v. SprattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Carolina Power & Light Company v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State Highway Commission v. MatthisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Hughes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Monongahela Power Co. v. ShackelfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API