Legal Opinion

Allen v. Hatchett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 26, 1955No. 35435, 35509PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, C. J.

The plaintiff in error contends that, since the case was remanded to the State superior court by consent order, the Federal court never gained jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of the State court was never suspended, that the case went into default, and that the court erred in allowing the defendants to file defensive pleadings, etc. To support this contention, the plaintiff in error cites Hunter v. Colquitt, 73 Ga. 44, 46. However, that case was rendered prior to the amendment of the “Removal Act,” 28 U. S. C. A., § 72. The present case must be decided under the amendment. 28 U. S. C. A., §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Mulheirn v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Hopson v. North American Ins. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Octavia Lowe v. Samuel Garfield JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Gremillion v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCMENT OF CPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Edward Hansen, Inc. v. Kearny Post Office Assocs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API