Legal Opinion

Carter v. Woods Bros. Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1926No. 26,531PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court, was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an appeal from a finding made in a workmen’s compensation case on an application for the appointment of an arbitrator that the relation of employer and employee existed between the plaintiff and Albert Hood and Botts & Hood, hereinafter ealled the defendants, and that the plaintiff is entitled to compensation from them by reason of an accident to the plaintiff and consequent injury sustained by him while in their employ.

The defendants were engaged in the construction of a hard-surfaced highway, and employed more than enough men to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bollinger v. City of Hill CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. MayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Busch v. BientzleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Hanson v. So. Side Canal Users AssoMontana Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API