Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Gerace

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1993No. 92-10388PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Richard Gerace argues that he is entitled to a new sentencing hearing or to withdraw his plea of guilty because the government breached a plea agreement providing that it would “stand silent at sentencing” when it argued against leniency at a subsequent probation revocation hearing. In addition, Ge-race contends that the district court violated Fed.R.Crim.P. ll’s prohibition against judicial participation in the plea bargaining process when it modified the original sentence. We affirm.

I

Gerace was indicted on April 20, 1989, in the Western District of New York on three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. William John Sutton, United States of America v. Freddie Goldbaum Ortiz, United States of America v. Valentine Frank ProitteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Rickey Dean SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Roman A. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Alberto De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Dennis Guy ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Henry LoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas J. PHILLIPS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Peltier v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API