Legal Opinion

Gilyard v. Gibson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 5, 2015No. 14-6229UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

ROBERT E. BACHARACH, Circuit Judge.

In 2014, Mr. Michael Gilyard sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Un known Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), 1 claiming violation of the Fourth Amendment in 2010. But a two-year period of limitations applied, and Mr. Gilyard waited four years to sue. Thus, the district court dismissed the suit.

Mr. Gilyard appeals,' urging tolling based on a legal disability. We ask: Did the district court err in declining to toll the limitations period? We conclude that the district…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Perkins v. Kansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Alexander v. OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Capuccio v. Capuccio (In re Capuccio)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Hopkins v. CrowDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API