Gilyard v. Gibson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
ROBERT E. BACHARACH, Circuit Judge.
In 2014, Mr. Michael Gilyard sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Un known Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), 1 claiming violation of the Fourth Amendment in 2010. But a two-year period of limitations applied, and Mr. Gilyard waited four years to sue. Thus, the district court dismissed the suit.
Mr. Gilyard appeals,' urging tolling based on a legal disability. We ask: Did the district court err in declining to toll the limitations period? We conclude that the district…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perkins v. Kansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Alexander v. OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Capuccio v. Capuccio (In re Capuccio)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2016
- Hopkins v. CrowDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021