Legal Opinion

Capuccio v. Capuccio (In re Capuccio)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 2016No. Case No. 16-10604-JDL; Adv. No. 16-1053-JDLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*932OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH

Janice D. Loyd, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Before the Court is the Defendant’s Amended Motion to Quash (the “Motion”) [Doc.17] a Subpoena Duces Tecum issued by the Plaintiff to the Fort Sill Federal Credit Union (the “Credit Union”), a non-party in this adversary proceeding. Plaintiff has timely responded to the Motion (the “Response”) [Doc.18].

Plaintiff issued a subpoena duces tecum to the Credit Union, seeking to obtain “monthly statements, negotiated checks, duplicate deposit receipts for all accounts of Elena Marie Capuccio (Defendant) for the period…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ennis v. Alder Protection HoldingsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
  2. Jason Morgan Trucking, LLC v. Progressive Commercial InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  3. Marathon Oil Permian, LLC v. Ozark Royalty Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API