Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. American Tar Products Co. v. Severin
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 24, 1934No. 3397PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, District Judge.
This ease came on to be heard upon a rule granted at the request of Neil P. Severin and Alfred D. Severin, a copartnership trading as N. P. Severin Company, to show cause why the service of the summons should not be set aside and the writ of summons quashed. The petitioners for the rule appeared de bene esse, for the purpose of raising the question.
The suit is brought under section 270, title 40 USCA, in the name of the United States of America, to the Use of American Tar Products Company, for labor and materials furnished N. P. Severin Company, one of the defendants,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Congress Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- J. E. Petty & Co. v. Dock Contractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- United States v. PalmerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lisa Homer v. Nathaniel Jones-BeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Keller v. American Sales Book Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Jones-Bey, Nathaniel v. Homer, LisaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005